Larkin-Skinner has more than 25 years of experience in all aspects of mental health and addiction care. As Regional Chief Executive Officer, Larkin-Skinner is responsible for the leadership and oversight of Centerstone’s operations in Florida. Melissa Larkin-Skinner is the Regional Chief Executive Officer for Centerstone, a nonprofit health system specializing in mental health and substance use disorder treatments. 10.Melissa Larkin-Skinner, MA, MBA, LMHC – Regional Chief Executive Officer An equivalence study of interview platform: Does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups? Adv in Health Sci Educ. 10.1093/asj/sjy219īallejos MP, Oglesbee S, Hettema J, Sapien R. Tele-Interview in the Aesthetic Fellowship Selection Process. Efficacy of Videoconference Interviews in the Pediatric Surgery Match. Virtual Surgical Fellowship Recruitment During COVID-19 and Its Implications for Resident/Fellow Recruitment in the Future. Vining CC, Eng OS, Hogg ME, Schuitevoerder D, Silverman RS, Yao KA, et al. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. Medical Students and COVID-19: Challenges and Supportive Strategies. Were key potential confounding variables measured and adjusted statistically for their impact on the relationship between exposure(s) and outcome(s)?Ĭhandratre S. Was loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less? Q14. Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants? Q13. Were the outcome measures (dependent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? Q12. Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once over time? Q11. Were the exposure measures (independent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? Q10. For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome (e.g., categories of exposure, or exposure measured as continuous variable)? Q9. Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an association between exposure and outcome if it existed? Q8. For the analyses in this paper, were the exposure(s) of interest measured prior to the outcome(s) being measured? Q7. Was a sample size justification, power description, or variance and effect estimates provided? Q6. Were all the subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar populations (including the same time period)? Were inclusion and exclusion criteria for being in the study prespecified and applied uniformly to all participants? Q5. Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%? Q4. Was the study population clearly specified and defined? Q3. Was the research question or objective in this paper clearly stated? Q2. Note-NIH = National Institutes of Health, NR = not reported, CD = cannot determine, NA = not applicable. Additionally, authors propose supportive strategies to help prepare applicants and institutions for VI. The knowledge obtained from this systematic review has the potential of helping applicants and institutions in preparing for VI process. There is an opportunity for potential research at multi-institutional level to gain better understanding of the efficacy of VI. There is dearth of evidence supporting the efficacy of VI. Most applicants and interviewing programs expressed reservations about VI's use as an alternative to FTFI. Most applicants could appropriately convey themselves through VI. 11 studies completely replaced FTFI with VI. There were 4 studies that reported the use of VI as a screening tool. Of the 934 articles screened, 22 articles underwent full-text article analysis to include 15 studies. Two reviewers selected articles and extracted data. Articles in English evaluating the effectiveness of VI were included, without applying any date limits. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and CINAHL databases were searched through May 2020. We also share best practice strategies for applicants and institutions in VI preparation. The purpose of this systematic review was to understand the process of VI, its effectiveness as an alternative to FTFI, and the experiences of applicants and institutions with VI. Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has forced upon all academic institutions to conduct virtual interviewing (VI) instead of face-to-face interviewing (FTFI) this interviewing cycle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |